“These conventions may be seen as strategies for humanizing writing and making personality the focal point of the text.” George Eliot intended her novels to be “faithful accounts of men and things as they mirrored themselves in the mind.” Readers will accept this, and take for granted an adequate relationship between reality and the knowing mind, and trust the ability of a competent novelist to transcribe it. As a result readers may treat “anything anomalous” as due to the author’s angle of vision, her “cast of mind,” her idiosyncrasies, suspicions, obsessions, memory lapses, feverish hallucinations. So on the one hand, we have evidence (Eliot’s testimony and readers’ expectations) supporting the view that the writing of a novel will, at least idiosyncratically, “mirror” aspects of the world that the living novelist will have experienced. On the other hand, we have the possibility that this “mirroring” operation and these expectations are “conventions.” For obviously there is no physical narrator present no audible “voice,” no there. There are only conventions, and the best “intentions” of an author are no match for the random misconceptions of a reader.
Peter J. Grieco is a retired English professor and former school bus driver. His poems have been widely published in small magazines online and in print. His book length series of poems include At the Musarium, a collection of semi-procedural verse based on word frequency lists;Misinterpretations of Dreams, a series which interrogates Freud’s seminal study of dream life; Structuralist Poetics, which attempts to come to terms with post-structuralism; and A Week on the Concord and Merrimac, celebrating Thoreau. His collection of ekphrastic verse,The Blind Man’s Meal is available from Finishing Line Press.